In this article:
In clinical research, the accuracy and integrity of data are non-negotiable. Every data point collected in a clinical trial shapes study outcomes, informs medical decisions, and meets regulatory standards. However, data discrepancies, errors, or missing values can occur during data entry, where the query resolution process becomes critical.
Query resolution refers to the structured workflow for identifying, clarifying, and resolving discrepancies in clinical trial data. This process helps ensure that the final dataset used for analysis is accurate, complete, and traceable. Each step demands precision, collaboration, and documentation, from identifying issues to closing queries.
In this article, we’ll walk through each phase of the query management process, showing how it supports data quality, helps streamline trial operations, and reinforces regulatory compliance.
Key Steps for Query Management in Clinical Trials
Managing queries in clinical data management requires a structured approach that ensures every issue is identified, resolved, and documented effectively. Below, we summarize the key steps supporting data integrity, compliance, and trial success.
1. Identifying the Issue: Initiating a Query
The query resolution process begins with the identification of potential data discrepancies. These issues can emerge during routine checks or reviews. They may be flagged by a clinical data manager, a Clinical Research Associate (CRA) during Source Data Verification (SDV), or automatically by an EDC system using built-in validation rules.
At this stage, the collected trial data is evaluated against:
- The clinical trial protocol
- The case report form (CRF) design and instructions
- Validation checks are configured in the data management system
The objective is to ensure that all data entry is consistent, complete, and within expected parameters before proceeding to analysis or regulatory submission.
Common Sources of Data Discrepancies
Several underlying causes can trigger query generation and impact data quality:
- Human Error: A common source of issues in clinical trial data. For instance, entering “50mg” instead of “5.0mg” due to a misplaced decimal point can result in incorrect dosing. Similarly, inputting a blood pressure value into the wrong field (e.g., diastolic and systolic) may produce clinically unrealistic data that requires clarification.
- Site Variability: In multicenter clinical trials, different sites may use varying units or collection methods (e.g., pounds vs. kilograms), resulting in inconsistent data that often prompts a query.
- Lack of Standardization: Inconsistent formats, unaligned data entry practices, or site-specific documentation workflows can introduce ambiguity, making it difficult to reconcile records without initiating a query.
2. Drafting and Sending the Query
After a discrepancy is identified, the next step in the query management in clinical trials is to generate a query that clearly communicates the issue to the clinical site for correction or clarification. The quality of the query wording plays a crucial role in the success of the query resolution in clinical trials.
Poorly written queries in clinical trials can cause miscommunication, lead to inaccurate responses, and delay the timely resolution of queries. The goal is to create a neutral, objective, and precise message.
- State the reported data clearly. Start by referencing the specific value, field, or data entry in question. This ensures the site can quickly locate and assess the relevant record.
- Describe the issue without suggesting a fix. Explain what appears to be incorrect, incomplete, or inconsistent. Avoid assumptions or proposing a solution to maintain neutrality in query management.
- Ask for verification or clarification, not correction. Phrase the query as a request for validation rather than suggesting edits. This maintains data objectivity and complies with clinical data management standards.
- Maintain a neutral tone. Use professional, unbiased language. The goal is to gather clarification, not to assign blame or imply error.
- Send via the appropriate platform. Queries are typically submitted through the EDC system or an electronic query management system integrated into the trial’s clinical data management workflow. These tools support secure communication, tracking, and audit compliance.
Example of a Well-Constructed Query:
“Subject 102’s recorded weight at Visit 3 is listed as 5.0 kg. Please verify if this value is accurate, as it appears lower than expected based on prior visit entries.”
This example:
- Identifies the entry (“5.0 kg at Visit 3”)
- Indicates the concern (value appears unusually low)
- Requests verification
- Avoids suggesting what the value should be
Well-drafted queries are a hallmark of efficient query resolution, helping to reduce delays and promote effective query management without compromising data quality.
3. Site Review and Response
When a query reaches the clinical site, designated site staff, typically the Study Coordinator or Principal Investigator, must respond accurately and professionally. This stage focuses on understanding the request and formulating a response rooted in verifiable source data.
- Thoroughly Understand the Query
Before taking any action, the site team must carefully review the query’s wording to determine precisely what is requested: clarification, confirmation, or explanation. If the query is unclear, the site should promptly seek clarification from the assigned monitor or data manager rather than risk an incorrect or incomplete response.
- Review Source Documentation
Patient charts, lab reports, visit logs, and other original documents are referenced to verify the accuracy of the queried data. The goal is to ensure that any response is based on objective, source-verified information.
- Craft Clear and Detailed Responses
Responses must go beyond simple acknowledgments such as “yes” or “confirmed.” They should provide relevant details and, where necessary, include supporting context.
- Address Missing or Irretrievable Data Transparently
In cases where the data cannot be recovered, the site should acknowledge the gap and explain the reason (e.g., “Lab report not available due to sample degradation, confirmed with testing lab”). This transparency helps preserve data integrity and ensures regulatory compliance.
- Submit the Response via the Approved System
All responses are entered directly into the Electronic Data Capture (EDC) platform or approved data management system, ensuring that communication is securely logged and routed for follow-up.
4. Review of Site Response and Data Update
Once the site submits its response:
- The data manager or CRA reviews the update for completeness and accuracy.
- If the response is valid, the data is accepted as-is or corrected per the site’s clarification.
- If the issue remains unresolved or the response is inadequate, a follow-up query may be generated, repeating the process.
This review ensures that no query is closed prematurely and that the resolution aligns with protocol standards and data validation rules.
5. Audit Trail and Documentation
Proper documentation is a cornerstone of query management in clinical research. Every query, from the moment it is created to the point of closure, must be recorded in a transparent, traceable, and audit-ready way. A robust audit trail supports regulatory inspections1 and upholds Good Clinical Practice (GCP) standards by ensuring data integrity throughout the trial.
What Should Be Documented:
- The Query Text and Reason: The original wording of the query, including what data point was questioned and why.
- Timestamps for Key Actions: Each interaction should be time-stamped, including when the query was raised, when a response was received, and when it was closed.
- Identifiers of Involved Staff: The audit trail should include the names or system IDs of the personnel who created, responded to, and resolved the query.
- Justification for Data Edits or Unresolved Items: If the data was modified, the reason for the change must be stated (e.g., “Corrected per source document dated MM/DD/YYYY”). If the data could not be recovered, the rationale should also be recorded (e.g., “Sample lost, site confirmed with lab on MM/DD/YYYY”).
- Resolution Notes or Comments: A comment or explanation should be added detailing how the query was resolved and whether the data was confirmed, corrected, or clarified. For paper-based studies, this should be entered directly into the EDC system or noted in the Case Report Form (CRF).
- Verbal Resolution (if applicable): If a query was resolved via phone or verbal discussion, the date, time, and key clinical indicators discussed should be logged as part of the resolution record.
Maintaining a complete audit trail ensures accountability, transparency, and compliance in all aspects of clinical data handling, especially during sponsor reviews or regulatory inspections.
6. Query Closure
Once the query has been resolved to the satisfaction of the data management team and aligns with study protocol and validation rules, it is marked as closed.
In modern EDC systems:
- Closure may be automatic if the data correction meets predefined rules.
- Manual review may still be required for complex queries or those with written justifications.
As Drug Discovery and Development 2 explains, “while machines may be data-driven and more accurate than manual approaches, human attributes are essential to provide the critical interpretation to understand the data.” This highlights the value of human oversight in resolving nuanced or ambiguous query cases that automated systems may not fully capture.
Closed queries are archived but remain accessible for regulatory or internal review in the audit trail.
Importance of Timely Query Resolution
In clinical trials, delays in resolving queries can create major setbacks. Whether from manual queries or system-generated queries, each query may highlight missing, inconsistent, or unclear data that must be addressed to maintain study integrity. When queries are addressed promptly, it protects accurate and reliable data and ensures the entire trial process runs smoothly.
1. Data Integrity and Compliance
Timely query resolution is essential for maintaining data integrity and meeting regulatory compliance standards. Unresolved queries can result in data gaps that become harder to resolve later, affecting both analysis quality and audit readiness. Sponsors and clinical trial teams can maintain cleaner datasets throughout the trial by ensuring queries are resolved as soon as they are flagged.
2. Efficiency and Cost Control
Implementing efficient query management and using automated query management tools like Electronic Data Capture (EDC) systems with built-in notification features helps streamline query workflows. These tools allow users to review data quickly, reducing unnecessary site queries, delays in data cleaning, and the cost of extended timelines.
The ability to optimize query workflows supports better resource planning and faster turnarounds.
3. Trial Success and Patient Safety
Promptly addressing queries related to adverse events or lab results is critical to patient safety. Timely interventions can prevent protocol violations or harm. From a strategic perspective, optimizing query resolution improves overall trial success, allowing faster reporting, submission, and decision-making based on accurate and reliable evidence.
Conclusion: Why Effective Query Resolution Matters
A strong query resolution process is essential to ensure reliable clinical trial data. By resolving issues early and accurately, teams can maintain data integrity, meet regulatory standards, and keep trials on schedule.
As decentralized trials grow, having the right tools is more important than ever. CDConnect™ is a secure, unified platform that streamlines clinical data capture, helping research teams manage queries more efficiently and keep trials running smoothly.
With the proper process and the right platform, clinical trial teams can stay compliant, confident, and ready for successful outcomes.
FAQs About Query Resolution
What Are the Best Practices for Timely Query Resolution in Clinical Trials?
Some best practices include setting clear deadlines, prioritizing urgent issues, and keeping team communication open. Using alerts and having a clear process helps make sure queries are addressed promptly. Training on practices for timely query resolution also helps teams respond quickly and accurately to queries raised.
How Does Query Management Affect Trial Efficiency and Data Quality?
Good query management helps improve trial efficiency and keeps the data cleaning process on track. Delays can slow things down and lead to mistakes. By improving query management, teams ensure that the data is clean, complete, and supports the success of clinical trials.
What Causes a High Number of Queries in a Clinical Trial?
The number of queries generated often depends on how complex the trial is and how consistent the data is across sites. Queries linked to anomalies in lab results or visit dates are common. Poor data entry or unclear documentation also raises more queries, especially since clinical trials involve many people and systems.
Improving documentation standards and real-time monitoring tools can help reduce lab queries and prevent avoidable discrepancies.
How Can Clinical Trial Teams Improve Query Management Practices?
Clinical trial teams can enhance their performance by utilizing tools that monitor queries in real time, implementing clear query management practices, and adhering to best practices for writing and reviewing queries. This approach simplifies the resolution of queries and boosts the overall effectiveness of the query process.
Sources:
- https://scdm.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2021-eCF_SCDM-ATR-Industry-Position-Paper-Version-PR1-2.pdf
- https://www.drugdiscoverytrends.com/querying-the-queries-an-ai-approach-to-manage-clinical-data-quality/#:~:text=However%2C%20while%20machines%20may%20be,and%20PhD%20from%20Leeds%20University.&text=Sheelagh%20Aird%2C%20PhD%2C%20is%20the,Data%20Operati
